|
MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING WEB |
| Introduction | Main Topics | Bibliography | Books | Journals | Textbooks | Marketplace | Links | Software |
| Contents | Search maaw | Summaries | Maaw's Book | Featured Pubs | Grad Course | Maaw's Blog | Gadgets | Videos |
|
Lyons, B., A. Gumbus and D. E. Bellhouse. 2003. Aligning capital investment decisions with the balanced scorecard. Journal of Cost Management (March/April): 34-38. Summary by Renauri Castro |
The balance scorecard has evolved from a
simple method of tracking data to a strategic tool. According to the authors 50%
of the Fortune 1000 companies use a balance scorecard for strategic analysis.
Balance scorecards are now being used to budget future capital asset
decisions to align future actions with a strategic plan. This article provides a case
study of a hospital that has used a balance scorecard to focus on its
strategy in a low to no margin industry.
The balance scorecard can help managers
direct their employees to certain goals since the scorecard is easy to understand. The Balance scorecard can also be used to relay company strategy to
shareholders and to show how managers are steering the company to its planned
strategy.
In an attempt to reach a healthy financial
position
|
Dimension |
Focus |
Metrics |
|
Organizational Health |
Employee Learning innovation and
growth |
Vacancies and turnover rates |
|
Quality improvement |
Patient satisfaction and outcomes |
Patient satisfaction surveys |
|
Process Improvement |
Cycle and turnaround times |
Time to admit length of stay |
|
Volume and Market Share Growth |
Customer perspective |
Clinical services, ambulatory
volumes |
|
Financial Health |
Maximizing revenues and managing
costs |
Financials |
Because of the positive results of the balance scorecard for the hospital they decided to apply the same approach to capital investment decisions. The following grid reflects the weights placed on the various dimensions in the matrix.
|
Dimension |
Related Capital Budgeting Criteria |
Clinical weight |
Nonclinical Weight |
IS Weight |
|
Organizational Health |
Ensure patient/ employee health and
safety |
0.15 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
|
Quality improvement |
Improve quality (clinical outcomes,
patient satisfaction, preference) |
0.25 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
|
Process Improvement |
Improve process (cycle time,
productivity) |
0.20 |
0.2 |
0.35 |
|
Volume and Market Share Growth |
Increase volume and market share |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
Financial Health |
Ensure financial health |
0.20 |
0.25 |
0.2 |
|
Total |
|
1 |
1.00 |
1 |
|
Criteria |
Clinical weight |
Project score |
Weighted Score |
|
Ensure patient/ employee health and
safety |
0.15 |
1 |
0.15 |
|
Improve quality (clinical outcomes,
patient satisfaction, preference) |
0.25 |
5 |
1.25 |
|
Improve process (cycle time,
productivity) |
0.2 |
10 |
2 |
|
Increase volume and market share |
0.2 |
10 |
2 |
|
Ensure financial health |
0.2 |
10 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
|
7.4 |
Future plans for the hospital are to use the
BSC at the manager level, having the different departments create their own
matrix. The hospital is also planning a separation of operating costs and
capital costs to ensure that funding for capital projects is made available.
The approach to investment analysis described in this article is similar to the Multiple Attribute Decision Model (MADM) described in Chapter 7 of the CAM-I conceptual design. See the note in the investment management summary.
| Balanced Scorecard Main Page | CAM-I Main Page |
| Capital Budgeting Main Page | Investment Management Main Page |