|
MANAGEMENT
AND ACCOUNTING WEB |

|
Bonabeau, E. 2004. The perils of the imitation
age. Harvard Business Review (June): 45-47,49-54.
Summary by Denisse Reguerin
Master
of Accountancy Program
University of South Florida, Fall 2004
|
The purpose of this article is to describe
the effects of imitation on our technologically advanced society.
Bonabeau explains that “imitation is a fundamental
element of human nature” and that people from all over the world influence our
thoughts and actions. Technology and all
the different communication channels available to us have made it very easy for
us to find out what others are doing, thinking and believe, and almost
instantaneously we are able to act on the information we compile.
Businesses like Harley-Davidson and Mountain Dew, have realized that
people care about their peer’s opinions and that many times word of mouth can
be a more powerful tool than millions of dollars spent on marketing.
Many times “what others do matters more to us than the facts” and we
will imitate them and their mistakes as well.
Imitation has impacted business and finance
tremendously; companies try to imitate the success of their competitors by
following their strategies and avoiding their mistakes.
Investors will sometimes follow a trend or bubble instead of making
rational decisions based on analysis of available information.
This type of behavior contributes to the volatility of individual stocks
and can sometimes decrease shareholder value. Imitation
however, is not always bad. It can be a
“rational economic choice” when information is too expensive or hard to
obtain, and it can provide a basis for learning. Nevertheless,
imitation can create instability and unpredictability because it can “swell a
single opinion into a mass movement or catapult the smallest player to the
forefront of a market”.
Motivations
The four principal drivers of imitation are:
- Safety
- Conformity
- Belief
that the other guy knows better
- Greed
The first driver, safety, affects people’s
willingness to take risks. A company’s
management would rather make a “safe” decision than to be the only one in
the industry to make a huge mistake. The
importance of the second driver, conformity, is the fact that people want to be
accepted, they will conform to the norm and will surround themselves with other
people who share their views and way of life. The
third driver is self explanatory and infers that people will follow the actions
of someone they admire or whom they believe is successful.
Finally the fourth driver, greed, assumes that people imitate others
because they have something the imitator wants.
“The widespread fear of missing out is at the heart of all speculative
bubbles” such as the dot-com bubble in 2000.
Mechanisms
Today’s society has a greater knowledge of what others think and do and
this is due in part to a combination of new technologies and feedback loops.
Per Bonabeau’s definition, feedback loops are “mechanisms for
collecting, sometimes aggregating, people’s thoughts, opinions, or preferences
and then communicating them back to the public”.
Best seller lists and movie rating are just two examples of feedback
loops that have been around for many years, but now with the use of the internet
the quality of feedback loops have changed dramatically to provide real time
results. Because these real time
results can sometimes impact subsequent opinions, some countries do not permit
opinion polling before an election because they fear it will influence the
outcome. Feedback loops are also
customized by some online retailers, who will suggest items to buy based on the
opinion and behavior of customers with similar opinions and behaviors. Click on
any Amazon book link for an example.
Multipliers
Imitation is very unpredictable since people do change their views constantly
and won’t always imitate the same behaviors or the same people or even
continue imitating for long periods of time.
This unpredictability is also increased by the lack of trusted references
or beacons (e.g., role models, church and government leaders, the SEC etc.) due
to incompetence, scandals or any other disappointing events which have changed
the publics perceptions. Some people take
a different approach by trying to predict the behavior of others in order to do
the opposite and not imitate them which will add to the instability and
unpredictability of the system. Small,
random differences can also increase the instability or predictability of
people’s behavior since an action can be taken due to something very
insignificant. For example,
a person walking by two cafes that are right next to each other and have the
same décor, menu and prices, might pick one over the other just because there
are two people sitting in the café they chose. This
doesn’t mean that the café is any better, but to the person walking by it may
seem that way since the other café is empty.
Markets
Bubbles and market frenzies occur frequently and are fueled by herding
behaviors from other investors responding to rumors or big transactions, whether
or not they are true or right. Analysts
and investors will buy stock based not only on their opinion about the stock but
also based on other people’s expectations. Investors
will turn to trusted sources, such as credit rating agencies, before making a
buy or sell decision. “A downgrade”
from one of these agencies, “affects not only a company’s debt, but also its
stock” which will make not only the stock but the rating more volatile since
the agencies are incorporating market data into their ratings.
Measures
Below are some tools and strategies that the author says will “help us at
least understand the possible outcomes of imitative behavior and exploit many of
the opportunities it creates”.
Target the hubs
Not all consumers are equal, some act as “hubs in imitation networks”, and
are able to influence thousands of others. For
example the designers in the fashion industry will have popular celebrities wear
their clothes so that the public will see them and want to wear that
designer’s clothing as well.
Keep it simple
People are more likely to understand and remember simple ideas and become more
suspicious of more complex ones. For
example, low-carb diets have become very popular since they are easy to follow
and many restaurants have even added low-carb meals to their menus.
Embrace the new channels
Companies must make the most of the new channels available to them and
utilize them to their advantage. Even
politician Howard Dean used the internet to recruit supporters and raise funds
prior to quitting the (democratic) race in February.
Give it away
Even if you must give your product away at first, you must get it out to
as many people as possible as fast as possible, since the “feedback loop is
started by the first few customers”.
Model what you can
Trying to understand and better handle imitation based dynamics is very
important and the author suggests using agent-based modeling “which simulates
complex systems- such as behavior and feedback loops- from bottom up”.
Be a rock
Finally, the author suggest that companies should focus on quality so
they will have a better chance their customers will return if they do decide to
follow someone else.
______________________________________
Question
This article looks at the imitation age from the
strategy perspective, particularly the marketing strategy perspective. How can
we apply the ideas in this paper to accounting? For example, are there
implications of the imitation age for concepts and techniques such as ABC, ABM,
JIT, TOC, benchmarking, and the balanced scorecard? Explain. (See
the Ittner & Larcker 03
summary and Deming's deadly diseases
and obstacles for some ideas).
See The
Tipping Point summary for how contagious behavior can create tipping points.
