|
MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING WEB |
| Introduction | Main Topics | Bibliography | Books | Journals | Textbooks | Marketplace | Links | Software |
| Contents | Search maaw | Summaries | Maaw's Book | Featured Pubs | Grad Course | Maaw's Blog | Gadgets | Videos |
|
Kaplan, R. S. and
D. P. Norton. 2001. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance
measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons (March):
87-104. Summary by Erica Hutchison |
Kaplan and Norton introduced the Balanced
Scorecard in 1992, because they believed that financial indicators alone were
insufficient to measure performance. Managers
that rely exclusively on financial measurements are encouraged to sacrifice
long-term improvement for short-term performance.
The Balanced Scorecard approach supplements financial measurements with
non-financial measures that indicate the actions that increase future financial
performance.
The Balanced Scorecard approach not only
provides a measure of non-financial performance; it links the measurement to
strategy. An important element of
the Balanced Scorecard is identifying the goals of the company and the
steps to achieve these goals. The
Balanced Scorecard also reflects the change in technology and competitive
advantage that came about in the 20th century.
An increase in the importance of intangible assets, such as customer
relationships and skills and knowledge of employees, has created the need for
non-financial measurements.
It is very difficult to measure the value of
intangible assets. The value of
intangibles is indirect and cannot be identified as separate from the context of
the organization. The value arises
from the collection of intangible assets and their implementation strategy.
The Balanced Scorecard approach does not try to “value” an
organization’s intangibles, but it does measure these assets in units other
than currency.
The Balanced Scorecard provides a framework
for developing a strategy map for an organization.
First, the strategic objectives are organized into four categories:
By using the strategy map, organizations create a common and understandable goal for all units and employees.
In developing a strategy map, organizations determine their goals and then work down as they plot the path that leads to the realization of the goals. For example, once the organization has financial and customer goals, they determine the internal business processes necessary to meet those goals. Once the internal business processes are determined, the organization determines the organization climate that will support the internal business process and determines a program of learning and growth.
Some organizations have already implemented scorecards that use a mixture of financial and non-financial measures. Two popular scorecards are the stakeholder scorecard and the key performance indicator scorecard.
The stakeholder scorecard identifies the major players in an organization such as shareholders, customers and employees. Then, the scorecard defines the organization’s goals for each of these different constituents. However, the scorecard does not discuss the strategies needed to achieve these goals.
The Key Performance Indicator scorecards offer a collection of financial and non-financial performance measurements that are organized into a list of perspectives. However, the overall strategy of the organization is not clear. A Balanced Scorecard enables all employees and units of the organization to understand the organization’s goals and shows them how they can contribute to reaching those goals.
Non-profit and government organizations (NPGOs) usually have trouble in determining their goal. Most of the initial scorecards of NPGOs have focused on increasing operational efficiency. “It takes vision and leadership to move from continuous improvement of existing processes to thinking strategically about which processes and activities are most important for fulfilling the organization’s mission.”
It is necessary for NPGOs to modify the
architecture of the Balanced Scorecard, because financial success is not their
primary objective. Many rearrange
the structure to put customers or constituents at the top of the hierarchy.
The financial and customer objectives should be replaced by three
different high-level perspectives:
After these objectives are defined, an NPGO can define the internal processes and learning and growth that are necessary to meet the objectives.
Once organizations developed the Balanced Scorecard, Kaplan and Norton began realizing that the scorecard was more than just a performance measurement system. Because the scorecard puts the organization’s focus on the future, they soon developed their new measures into a management system. “The Balanced Scorecard provides the ‘recipe’ that enables ingredients already existing in the organization to be combined for long-term value creation.”
| Balanced Scorecard Main Page | Performance Measures Main Page | Strategy Related Main Page |