|
MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING WEB |
|
Lessner, J. 1989. Performance measurement in a just-in-time environment: Can traditional performance measurements still be used? Journal of Cost Management (Fall): 22-28. Summarized by Linda
Perez |
Main idea: A well-designed and properly applied performance measurement system is the strongest management tool available for controlling operations and fostering change. Therefore, companies that have made (or are considering making) the change to such advanced manufacturing techniques as JIT should make certain that their performance measurement systems will lead to the performance needed in an advanced manufacturing environment.
Issues:
JIT implementation should consider the following issues in the system:
|
JIT Environment |
Traditional Performance Measures |
Impact of Performance Measures on the Production Environment |
|
No inventory Zero defects Lot sizes of one 100% on-time delivery rate |
Financially oriented, i.e. standard cost variance and most ratio analyses |
Financial performance measurements present only a desired result or goal, creating gaps. They do not communicate the means and approach to achieving the goals. |
|
INVENTORY IMPACTS Inventory is viewed as a liability, rather than as an asset. |
Short-term scope Prone to foster sub-optimal performance. |
Non-financial performance measures work well to fill the gaps. They assist in communicating the desired goals. |
Performance measurement system guidelines:
The first step toward achieving optimum results from performance measurement systems is to evaluate their effectiveness. A performance measurement system evaluation should verify that the system supports the company’s strategic goals:
| JIT Main Page | Performance Measures Main Page |