MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING WEB

Introduction Main Topics Bibliography Books Journals Textbooks Marketplace Links Software
Contents Search maaw Summaries Maaw's Book Featured Pubs Grad Course Maaw's Blog Gadgets Videos

Troxel, R. and M. Weber. 1990. The evolution of activity-based costing. Journal of Cost Management (Spring):14-22.

Summary by Henry Stoll
Master of Accountancy Program
University of South Florida, Fall 2000

Troxel and Weber discuss the 3 phases of ABC development, the future phase, and provide some company examples for each of the various phases. These sections are summarized in the tables below.

3 PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT FOR ACTIVITY-BASED COSTING

PHASE

TIME PERIOD

CHARACTERISTICS

Phase 1 – Serendipitous Implementation

® 1980

  • ABC characteristics were present in some systems.
  • The ABC approach was not yet identified.
  • Systems with ABC characteristics were just considered a sophisticated traditional system.
  • Systems were used for normal financial purposes, not strategic purposes.
  • Most common in Europe.

Phase 2 – Ad Hoc Implementation

1980® 1985

  • The ABC approach was identified and differences from the traditional cost accounting methods were recognized.
  • No structure was yet defined for ABC systems.
  • ABC was considered an alternative to a conventional cost system.
  • The few systems that were developed were on an ad hoc basis.
  • Recognition that ABC provides some strategic insights, but still used primarily for financial reporting.
  • Some concern that full implementation of ABC would conflict with GAAP.

Phase 3 – Structured Implementation

1985®

  • Objectives and approaches of development of ABC systems have been specifically identified.
  • Recognition that ABC provides strategic insights and should be used as a decision making tool.
  • ABC no longer considered just a replacement for an existing cost accounting system.
  • Database technology has helped make ABC more practical.
  • Cooper and Kaplan helped lead the way through their research and writings.

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD?

PHASE 4 – Integration with Performance Management

2000®

  • Both commonalities and disparities will be recognized between cost drivers and critical performance factors.
  • Continue to better link product costing, performance measurement, and investment justification.

 

COMPANY EXAMPLES OF THE 3 PHASES

PHASE

COMPANY PROFILE

RESULTS OF STUDY

MANAGEMENT REACTIONS

1

Vegetable canning

- Cost system based on joint product costing.

- Linear programming and simulation models were used for planning.

Results from the models and the cost system varied greatly and lacked comparability.

A direct cost system was developed using multiple regression. (this was not recognized as an ABC system at the time).

The ABC system provide insight, and several changes to operations and marketing were successfully implemented.

2

Pharmaceutical

- Used a direct cost system.

- 15% of products provided over 90% of revenue.

- Revenues were growing, but profit margin was decreasing.

Used a quality control cost pool with # of products as the cost driver to allocate these costs to finished good.

Small-volume products were being undercosted by the old system.

Management recognized the use of ABC; however, implementation was too expensive. They weeded out their low-volume products.

3

Automobile Parts Supplier

- A large customer requested a 5 % price reduction on a product with a 7% profit margin.

- Turned down the request and needed new customers.

Use of an ABC system returned a 19% profit margin for the product, instead of 5%.

Management directed its efforts to recapturing the lost customer by allowing the price reductions.

 

 

ABC Main Page History & Development Main Page

Books
DVDs
Electronics

 Magazines
Software
VHS

Google
 
Web maaw.info